Skip to main content
metaintro

Automation risk assessment

Graphic Designers: AI exposure and automation risk

Graphic Designers score 41% on the Eloundou et al. LLM exposure measure (moderate exposure). 12 of 16 rated tasks are exposed. BLS projects −1.7% employment, 2025–35.

Data compiled 2026-10-09 · BLS 2025–35 · O*NET 31.0 · AEI May 2026

LLM exposure (β)

41%

Moderate exposure

BLS projects −1.7% employment for graphic designers from 2025 to 2035.

Eloundou et al., Science 2024

Exposure scores

How much of this occupation's task list large language models could speed up

41%

Moderate exposure (β, human-rated)

Share of this occupation's tasks that annotators judged an LLM could do at least 50% faster at the same quality, counting tasks that need extra software at half weight.

Eloundou et al., Science 2024

50%

Same measure, rated by GPT-4

The study's model-rated β for comparison. Directly exposed tasks alone (α) score 0%; all exposed tasks (ζ) score 82%.

Eloundou et al., Science 2024

37%

Observed exposure in real AI usage

How much of the theoretically exposed work actually shows up as automated, work-related Claude usage.

Anthropic observed exposure (Mar 2026)

Exposed and unexposed tasks

Human ratings of 16 O*NET task statements, Eloundou et al., Science 2024

Of 16 rated tasks, 0 are directly exposed (E1), 12 are exposed once complementary software is built (E2), and 4 are not exposed (E0).

Exposed tasks

  • Confer with clients to discuss and determine layout design.

    E2 · Exposed with added software

  • Create designs, concepts, and sample layouts, based on knowledge of layout principles and esthetic design concepts.

    E2 · Exposed with added software

  • Develop graphics and layouts for product illustrations, company logos, and Web sites.

    E2 · Exposed with added software

  • Use computer software to generate new images.

    E2 · Exposed with added software

  • Review final layouts and suggest improvements, as needed.

    E2 · Exposed with added software

Tasks not exposed

  • Determine size and arrangement of illustrative material and copy, and select style and size of type.

    E0 · Not exposed

  • Mark up, paste, and assemble final layouts to prepare layouts for printer.

    E0 · Not exposed

  • Prepare notes and instructions for workers who assemble and prepare final layouts for printing.

    E0 · Not exposed

  • Photograph layouts, using camera, to make layout prints for supervisors or clients.

    E0 · Not exposed

Job outlook

U.S. projections, BLS Employment Projections 2025–35

−1.7%

Projected employment change, 2025–35

From 253,100 jobs in 2025 to 248,800 in 2035. All occupations: +3.5%.

BLS Employment Projections 2025–35

16,000

Openings per year, 2025–35 average

Includes openings from growth and from workers who retire or change occupations.

BLS Employment Projections 2025–35

$62,960

Median annual wage, 2025

BLS Employment Projections 2025–35

Bachelor's degree

Typical education for entry

BLS Employment Projections 2025–35

What BLS expects to change

Productivity change, capital/labor substitution - share decreases as new technologies, including artificial intelligence (AI), replace some workers and make other workers more efficient.

BLS note on factors affecting graphic designers employment, Table 1.12, BLS Employment Projections 2025–35.

Primary profiles: BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook · O*NET OnLine

How AI is used on this work

Claude.ai conversations on this occupation's tasks, Anthropic Economic Index (May 2026)

Augmentation (AI works with the person)70.4%
Automation (AI does the task)29.6%

Augmentation and automation are shares of conversations with a classified collaboration pattern, excluding unclassified conversations. The individual pattern shares include them. 75.0% of all conversations on these tasks were for work. See the full collaboration breakdown

Sources & methodology

Every figure on this page comes from the public datasets below. We do not edit the source values; derived figures are explained here.

  1. Exposure is the human-annotator β score from Eloundou et al.: the share of an occupation's O*NET tasks that a large language model could do at least 50% faster at equal quality, counting tasks that need extra software (E2) at half weight. We label β under 0.25 low, 0.25–0.5 moderate, and 0.5 or more high; these bands are ours, not the authors'.
  2. Task labels (E0 not exposed, E1 directly exposed, E2 exposed with complementary software) are the study's aggregated human ratings of each O*NET task statement for the occupation. We show up to five tasks per group.
  3. Observed exposure (Anthropic, March 2026) combines that theoretical feasibility with real Claude usage on the occupation's tasks, weighting automated and work-related use more heavily than augmentative use, then averaging by time spent on each task. Values run from 0 to 1.
  4. Employment, growth, openings, wage, and education are the BLS 2025–35 projections as published; BLS utilization notes are quoted verbatim.
  5. Collaboration shares come from Anthropic Economic Index data for Claude.ai conversations in May 2026, classified to the O*NET tasks they match. "Automation" groups directive and feedback-loop conversations; "augmentation" groups task iteration, learning, and validation. Both buckets are shares of conversations with a classified collaboration pattern, excluding the unclassified "none" pattern; the six individual pattern shares include unclassified conversations. They describe how people use Claude on this occupation's tasks — not what share of workers in the occupation use AI.
  6. BLS occupations are matched to O*NET-SOC codes with the BLS O*NET-to-NEM crosswalk; where a BLS occupation spans several O*NET occupations, we average their values.
  7. Exposure measures what AI could help do, not a forecast of job loss.

  • Eloundou et al., Science 2024

    Eloundou, T., Manning, S., Mishkin, P., & Rock, D. (2024). "GPTs are GPTs: Labor market impact potential of LLMs." Science, 384(6702), 1306–1308. doi:10.1126/science.adj0998. Occupation- and task-level exposure data from the authors' public repository (openai/GPTs-are-GPTs).

    Vintage: Published June 21, 2024; human annotations of O*NET tasks collected 2023. License: Data repository: MIT License. Retrieved 2026-10-09.

  • Anthropic observed exposure (Mar 2026)

    Massenkoff, M., & McCrory, P. (2026). "Labor market impacts of AI: A new measure and early evidence." Anthropic, March 5, 2026. Occupation-level observed exposure (Anthropic Economic Index, labor_market_impacts/job_exposure.csv).

    Vintage: Published March 5, 2026. License: CC BY (data). Retrieved 2026-10-09.

  • BLS Employment Projections 2025–35

    U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment Projections program. Occupational projections, 2025–35, and worker characteristics, 2025 (Table 1.2); fastest growing occupations (Table 1.3); factors affecting occupational utilization (Table 1.12).

    Vintage: 2025–35 projections, released August 27, 2026. License: Public domain (U.S. federal government work). Retrieved 2026-10-09.

  • Anthropic Economic Index (May 2026)

    Massenkoff, M., Lyubich, E., Sacher, S., Hitzig, Z., Zhang, S., Heller, R., & McCrory, P. (2026). "Anthropic Economic Index report: Cadences." Anthropic, June 26, 2026. Claude.ai usage metrics by occupation, global, May 2026.

    Vintage: Release of June 26, 2026; Claude.ai conversations from May 2026. License: CC BY (data). Retrieved 2026-10-09.

  • O*NET 31.0 Database

    This page includes information from the O*NET 31.0 Database by the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (USDOL/ETA). Used under the CC BY 4.0 license. O*NET® is a trademark of USDOL/ETA. Metaintro has modified all or some of this information. USDOL/ETA has not approved, endorsed, or tested these modifications.

    Vintage: O*NET 31.0, August 2026 release. License: CC BY 4.0. Retrieved 2026-10-09.

Return to navigation